|
No person except a natural born Citizen shall be eligible to become a president
[1 2 3 ... 5]
|
noshpa
82 posts
 author
|
 posted 10/22/2006 12:16:20 AM
 reply
According to Article II,Section I of the U.S Constitution,nobody but naturally born citizen eligible to run for president. However,the Declaration of Independence states that "all men are created equal;that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights;that among these are life,liberty,and the pursuit of happiness." It means that Constitution violates the Declaration.And the fact that naturalized citizens denied this right,makes them sort of "not good enough" secondary elements of the society.Doesn't it sound nationalistic?
|
|
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 12:30:27 AM
reply
noshpa. you are right. in that article. it does say that. pachemu?
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 12:33:30 AM
reply
our fathers. did not want an heirarcy. they wanted; and strived for a government; that was without blueblood
|
noshpa
82 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 12:39:36 AM
reply
And it's not even fair for Dan's favorite Shwarcenegger(or however you spell it) even if he is a dumbass.I bet you Shwarzz is pissed about it badly.
But I believe this paragraph in Constitution is a nationalistic crap,it has been written over 200 years ago,and they don't bother to change it because it a "saint truth" written by "saint people". Amen. good night
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 12:40:39 AM
reply
who was the first republican president in america? who was the last WHIG president?. have there ever been an tory president in america?
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 12:42:01 AM
reply
to whom is the saints people? ja ne znau
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 12:43:39 AM
reply
and if you don't want to talk? goodnight
|
noshpa
82 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 12:47:15 AM
reply
Hey,brad,I don't know what our fathers wanted,but I know what i want--sleep.Getting kinda late.And I can't believe I am sitting here thinking about Constitution that late at night.It sad. Be good Brad.and study Russian.Xorosho???
|
noshpa
82 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 12:51:55 AM
reply
Brad,what do you mean who was the first republican presid?there were two main Parties Federalists and Republicans.Whashington stayed neutral by the way.But the republican party back then wasn't the same republican party we have now even though they have the same name.
|
dan123
3433 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 1:04:40 AM
reply
What are you talking about? There was a very popular person, who was born in Britain and who could have become the president of the US and we did not want that.
|
noshpa
82 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 1:07:42 AM
reply
hey,brad,but I can tell you the last republican president,and I can also tell you that he sucks.I think that we should send him to the nursing home.Progressive dementia is irreversible,you know.
don't be mad,Brad,I am just aggravating you.
 
|
noshpa
82 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 1:15:02 AM
reply
Dan,I was talking about that naturalized citizens can't run for presidency,according to the Constitution,of course.And I don't know what Brad was talking about,I think he was trying to quiz me on American history.
|
noshpa
82 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 1:16:30 AM
reply
Stay cool,guys.Spokoinoi nochi to everyone
|
dan123
3433 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 1:56:32 AM
reply
Good night.
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 10:24:12 AM
reply
i was quizzing you noshpa. but here is how it goes.washington was a federlist.then in order. adams; fed.,jefferson dem.,madison,dem,.monroe;dem.,adams, the son;dem,.jackson;dem.,van buren;dem.;harrison;whig.tyler;dem. polk;dem.,taylor;whig. fillmore;whig. pierce;dem.;buchanan;dem.;lincoln;rep.......... thier were also tories at the time. but that was left-over from meery-ole england. you know.chip-chip tarry-oh. spot o tea; and all that other english crap. lincoln suspended the constitution at the time of his presidency. he enacted martial law.and yes the current guy in office is a lame #uck..... but that will change in 2 years..... then we will get another lame #uck. probably a dem..
|
noshpa
82 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 11:03:11 AM
reply
brad,you confused the heck out of me.Washington stayed neutral.He was against political parties to be formed.At the time Constitution was written,two political parties were taking place ,like I mentioned earlier,Federalists and Republicans (sometimes they call it democratic republican)something like that ,but it was one party,and Federalists were opposing it.'member,Hamilton and Adams were in Feder.party and Jefferson and Madison organized the republican party. But what all of that has to do with not letting naturalized citizens run for presidency? Why are you talking about republic and democr?? It's not what I was trying to point out.
|
Kardanovski
248 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 11:28:30 AM
reply
brad62:article 2,section 1 USA Constitution-is diskriminaited against millions citisens you country.This is absurd.If you come to USA 100 years ago,you shall be not become president!?Absurd!
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 11:28:00 PM
reply
kard. if you came to america 100 years ago; you would have died of old age by now. Washington was born in great britian. his parents moved to america when he was" like 2 or someother crap like that".he was asked to become the king of america. his reply was. " what did we fight a war for" did you not remember the oppression?
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 10/22/2006 11:31:08 PM
reply
oh; by the way noshpa. what the shit were you doing up at midnight reading the constitution of the united states?my friend; get a life; go out and get laid. poontang is much better than that boring dusty-off-ski shit
|
skinny
574 posts
author
|
posted 10/23/2006 6:48:21 AM
reply
Brad, noshpa is a female
|
|
next 20 >>
|
New Topic
