|
New World Order
[1 2 3 4 5 6 7]
|
Kardanovski
264 posts
 author
|
 posted 27 Oct 2006 1:34:56 PM
 reply
#41
ШЕР:здесь все несут чушь не по теме.Тема"НОВЫЙ МИРОВОЙ ПОРЯДОК".Вроде серьезно,солидно.Ну а "обсуждение"вылилось в простой интернетный стеб.не более и не выше того.Особенно забавен brad, как и многие амеры и недопереваренные амеры.Вид недопереваренного продукта всегда вызывает тонкие гастрономическо-эстетические чувства.
|
|
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 27 Oct 2006 10:58:39 PM
reply
#42
i caught the new world order; and my name kard. the rest bored me.maybe i will bring my dictonary next time. maybe.
|
Serega13
Moderator
1768 posts
author
|
posted 29 Oct 2006 10:21:49 AM
reply
#43
Brad, don't pay attention to Kardanovsky, he just likes to annoy the crap out of everyone.
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 29 Oct 2006 12:06:00 PM
reply
#44
it's immpossible to pay attention when i only know a few words of russian. he can say whatever he wants. it all goes over my head. in this case; ignorance is BLISS.
|
Sheriff
Admin
5880 posts
author
|
posted 3 Nov 2006 11:32:10 AM
reply
#45
Rockefellers and the New World Order
Quote:
"George Wallace made famous the slogan that there is not a dime's worth of difference between the Democrat and Republican parties. Many observers have noted that while the two parties use different rhetoric and aim their spiels at differing segments of the population, it seems to make little difference who actually wins the election. The reason for this is that while grass roots. Democrats and Republicans generally have greatly differing views on the economy, political policies, and federal activities, as you climb the sides of the political pyramid the two parties become more and more alike. The reason their dime's worth of difference is that instead of having two distinctly different groups called Democrats and Republicans, we actually have Rockedems and Rockepubs (i.e. both sides are controled by Rockefellers - my comment).
Every four years the Americans have the privilege of choosing between the Rockepubs candidate and the Rockedems standard bearer."
Here's a table of presidential elections in USA since 1956.
CFR - Council on Foreign Relations, organization founded and controled by Rockefellers.
In 1952 and 1956, CFR Adlai Stevenson challenged CFR Eisenhower.
In 1960, it was CFR Nixon vs. CFR Kennedy.
1964 CFR briefly lost control of one candidate, the other was CFR member
1968- That year CFR Nixon was pitted against CFR Humphrey.
1972 "contest" featured CFR Nixon vs. CFR Mc Covern.
1976 CFR (or Bildebergs) Gerald Ford vs. CFR Jimmy Carter.
1980 CFR Carter vs. Ronald Reagan (who is believed not to be in CFR, but his vicepresident Geroge Bush was a CFR member)
1984 CFR Mondale vs. Ronald Reagan
1988 CFR Dukakis vs CFR George Bush
1992 CFR Clinton vs CFR George Bush
1996 CFR Clinton vs CFR Albert Gore
2000 CFR George W Bush vs CFR Albert Gore
2004 CFR George W Bush vs CFR John Kerry
An UNBELIEVABLE situation. I am sorry, noone can possibly call this farce a democracy.
As always, don't believe everything I've said, do your own research.
[Message edited by Sheriff on 11/3/2006 12:04:25 PM]
|
Sheriff
Admin
5880 posts
author
|
posted 3 Nov 2006 12:06:13 PM
reply
#46
More about Rockefellers in our forum. Fascinating family, indeed!
|
dan123
3710 posts
author
|
posted 3 Nov 2006 1:47:19 PM
reply
#47
"1996 CFR Clinton vs CFR Albert Gore"
Ну вот, оказывается в 1996 году вице-президент попёр против президента. А он тогда, случайно, республиканцем не заделался?
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 3 Nov 2006 11:37:06 PM
reply
#48
sherriff. bob dole. not ; albert gore. in . if we are to trust your theories of democracy; then lets not get al gore, and robert dole confused.if that were the case? democrap[ mand that is not a typo] against democrap.we have the same slang for our political leaders.as you say. [look up everything; don't trust me] [i also say the same thing]. gore and bush are ivy leaguers.[ skulls and bones] wwoooo. scary stuff. lol.but really. i still say. if you vote against the 2 party line. you throw away your vote. it's not right. but they are the faction with all the money. all we have to do is. decide the leesor of 2 evils 
|
dan123
3710 posts
author
|
posted 4 Nov 2006 12:23:49 AM
reply
#49
I think we have it pretty good.
Spain has a selebration, where they carry out US flag and their prime minister stands up for it.
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 4 Nov 2006 10:30:36 AM
reply
#50
the prime minister of spain must be a smart man.danny boy; i also think we have it pretty good here in the u.s. of a..
|
Sheriff
Admin
5880 posts
author
|
posted 4 Nov 2006 2:18:45 PM
reply
#51
You think you have it pretty good? K, I have one mistake, and I don't know whether Dole is a CFR member. Even considering this - since 1952 there were only 2 (or 3) presidential candidates that were not members of Council on Foreign Relations, controlled by Rockefellers.
I don't know what you think you have that is pretty good, but I call it how it is - completely controlled anti-democratic government.
brad62: all we have to do is. decide the leesor of 2 evils
And what I am pointing out is that IT IS THE SAME EVIL, not 2. And you refuse to aknowledge proven argument.
[Message edited by Sheriff on 11/4/2006 2:21:09 PM]
|
dan123
3710 posts
author
|
posted 4 Nov 2006 4:10:50 PM
reply
#52
If you know a better system, point it out, pls.
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 4 Nov 2006 11:16:32 PM
reply
#53
sherriff. i think i have said many times. it is the same faces. not even different names. 2 party system. goddamn it.if an independent could get the money to run for president? wow  . maybe *hit would get done. but it doesn't happen. money rules. he has the money makes the rules.history books are written by the winners.sherriff; do you like conspiracy theories? i thought you did. brb.
|
Sheriff
Admin
5880 posts
author
|
posted 5 Nov 2006 2:25:04 PM
reply
#54
dan123: If you know a better system, point it out, pls.
This is another attempt to move discussion from topic - which is NEW WORLD ORDER - to some pointless argument that has no meaning or right answer.
Back to the topic - brad, I agree, there's no point voting between a Rockepub or Rockedem. Heck, I can also say that elections is a sham. A small group of people stays in control, simply by reelecting their own members into ruler seat. Now they try to also bring this kind of Kingdom onto other nations, and that is NOT GOOD. Because every other country has caught up to this sham, they know what these guys are up to. WE, THE PEOPLE OF UNITED STATES, will suffer from this.
|
dan123
3710 posts
author
|
posted 5 Nov 2006 4:33:32 PM
reply
#55
What does SHAM mean?
И не страдай ты так, что, такс кат маленький?  Заплати налоги и спи спокойно.  Кстати, я не видел фамилии "Рокфеллер" в списке самых богатых людей мира.
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 5 Nov 2006 10:55:40 PM
reply
#56
sham; means spurious, not real. at least the sherriff and i agree on 1 thing almost. the elections are a joke. but that does not mean that you should forget to vote on tuesday.at least those of us that are eligible to vote. but back to the topic. NEW WORLD ORDER. Sherriff; where did you look up about the rocka-pucks? i would like to read it for myself.
|
Sheriff
Admin
5880 posts
author
|
posted 6 Nov 2006 8:38:45 AM
reply
#57
brad, click on the link I posted a few posts ago.
Also, if you know exactly what you are looking for, you can find a lot of stuff by just Googling it.
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 6 Nov 2006 12:49:24 PM
reply
#58
i clicked on the link. i read most of it.
|
Kardanovski
264 posts
author
|
posted 15 Nov 2006 4:43:46 PM
reply
#59
Ребята!Затащили на тему упрощенного амера brad62 и издеваетесь.Это не подпадет под закон о защите животных?!
|
brad62
2373 posts
author
|
posted 16 Nov 2006 8:18:06 AM
reply
#60
kard; if you want to put me down? do it in english. so that i may offer a rebuttal
|
|
<< previous 20
next 20 >>
|
En 
Рус
New Topic
